SEGA Sequels: Risky SEGA Sequels

Has it really been 20 weeks? Holy crap! Well, at any rate, for Episode 20 and probably the next episode or so, I’m going to be taking a look at sequels that really pushed the boundaries of what one would expect as a followup to another game. When making a sequel, a developer has a few different choices. Sometimes, they choose to take the easy way out, simply repeating the formula from the sequel’s predecessor and hoping that their audience is simply looking for more of the same….something that didn’t work for The Hangover 2, that’s for sure. Other times, a developer might try to tweak the formula, but still aim to deliver the same overall experience, abeit one that’s been improved. Then, there are developers who decide to take their sequel in an entirely different direction, by far the riskiest strategy of the 3. Sometimes it works, and the fans accept it, and then other times….tweaking the formula too drastically can result in a sequel that the fans hate. This week I’m going to take a look at Jet Set Radio Future, a game I’ve talked about in this feature before; what made it so different, why it was such a risky game to make, and, well, did these changes work?

Looking back, I’m not sure why Smilebit chose to switch things up so much for Jet Set Radio Future. Granted, I don’t have access to sales figures for the original game, but it was critically-acclaimed, got great feedback from people who played it, and obviously did well enough for a sequel to be green-lit. The scene was set for another arcade-style tagging romp through Tokyo-to, but Smilebit chose to do something risky; they decided to make their second Jet Set game a reboot instead of a sequel.

The soundtrack continued in the same vein as its predecessor’s, it kept the same cel shaded visuals, (though they were upgraded significantly) and it featured a lot of returning characters, but that was about it. The timer was eliminated entirely, as was the analog stick spray painting system, which was instead replaced with a single trigger click. This alone created a substantial change to the sequel’s gameplay. No longer was the game centered around hectic spray-painting sessions, with you racing through the streets as you faught a time limit and pursuing cops. Instead, Jet Set Radio Future took a more freeroaming approach. Levels that originally were meant to be completed in under 10 minutes were now designed to stretch out for over 30, sometimes even hours. Hidden characters were now scattered throughout the stages, with you encouraged to search them out, and police only went after you in scripted boss battles and closed-in confrontations. The pacing could only be described as more….relaxed, and this freeroaming nature applied to every aspect of the game. A series of menus no longer took you to levels or to new characters, with you now having to skate through levels to get to other levels, much like exploring a full city. No longer rewarded with a Professor K cutscene after each level, JSRF often had you go from one level to another without the narrative moving forward, blurring the line between when one mission ended and another one began.

It’s interesting to think about why Smilebit chose to switch up the formula to such a degree. I imagine that there are some studios out there who are so ambitious that they just can’t stand the idea of making the same game again, or even a game that’s remotely similar. I wonder if that was Smilebit’s mentality for developing JSRF, or if it was instead a decision driven by the decrease in popularity of arcade games. Jet Grind Radio was never an arcade game, but it was developed with a very arcade-style pace, something the sequel lacked to a pretty shocking degree. I can’t even cite GTA3 as a possible influence for the change, since the games released too closely to each other for that to have been a possibility, so exactly why Smilebit chose to take such a sharp turn away from the original game for its sequel is pretty much a mystery. What I do know for sure, though, is that it created a scenario where we ended up with a sequel that was an entirely different experience from the original. For better or for worse, I never felt when playing JSRF that I had ever played anything like it before, and that’s definitely an achievement, especially since it came out not even two years after the original game.

Did the risk pay off?

It wouldn’t be a risk without the possibility of it backfiring, and so the question is, did JSRF’s changes make the experience better or worse? For me, it’s a bit of a toss up. There’s no question that I prefer the original Jet Set Radio for a number of reasons. I thought the gameplay was much faster, the story more interesting, the level design much less likely to be your enemy, and overall, the energy level to be higher. Jet Set Radio Future’s change in direction wasn’t without its benefits though, including a much longer game length, a city that felt more like a city and less like a series of levels, and greater level variety. Plus, the game was still incredibly fun to play. On the other hand, though, every time I replay the game and wind up helplessly lost in the Skyscraper District, hours having gone by, I find myself feeling the loss of the original game’s time limit and the short levels to match it.

I should be clear, though, that it’s not my intention to bash Jet Set Radio Future. Smilebit took huge risks, and while I don’t personally think they created a game on par with its predecessor, it was refreshing to have two very different games as part of the same series; two very different experiences, each one compelling in its own right. The first game was unlike any I had ever played before, and, lo’ and behold, the second game was also unlike anything I had ever played before. How often does that happen?

Comments? Which Jet Set game did you prefer? Feel free to leave ’em below.

Ad:

5 responses to “SEGA Sequels: Risky SEGA Sequels

  1. cube_b3 says:

    Whether your intention was to bash it or not, I feel you bashed SmileBit's nuts off.

    Maybe cause I am currently playing HeadHunter: Redemption and the original DC version is one of my top 10 Dreamcast games and the prequel is an original train wreck.

    It changed to many things, removed a lot of things that worked tryed to make it more Metal Gear Solid than it needed to be, similarly you make it sound that JSRF was trying to be something modernized and evolved incorporating open worlds, which didn't really start with GTA3.

    I don't know I've played the original but haven't played the X-box reboot and after playing HeadHunter: Redemption I might've to take your word that it may have been a step down.

  2. I love them both, but enjoy the original more so for many of the reasons stated above. The pace of first game works so well since you have a timer to fight against, you lose time and slow the game down when tagging, and your character moves much slower. Those all succeed at raising the intensity when you really want to get a Jet rating, but drag ass along the way. I do wish boosting was more effective, cause my finger gets really sore from pulling the trigger so much to get my rudie in gear.

    The level design of JSRF is pretty twisted, and kind of artificially extends the duration of the game. Skyscraper District is easily the worst part of the game, and I'm not a fan of the sewer level either, even though The Latch Brothers soundtrack kicks into full gear there. Alternatively, mastering the platforming of the game is a satisfying experience, but lots of suffering is required. The levels are beautiful though, and really exemplify modular design with how they stacked so many reused assets around the level without being too obvious about it.

    I'm not sure if I prefer the menu-based level selection in JSR, or the open world of JSRF. It's nice to instantly specify which level you want, but the part of JSR where you race through all the Tokyo-to levels and see how they connect is/was an incredible experience. It can be a pain in JSRF to get anywhere, but it does raise the immersion. JSRF feels more like an offline MMO because of its open world, and I dig that.

  3. -nSega54- says:

    Cube; lol my intention is definitely not to bash JSRF, which I thought was a good game. But I thought many of Smilebit's changes felt like they added "more" to the game at the cost of some of the fun. (Especially regarding the level design.) But still a good game. I'm praising Smilebit for taking risks and trying something new, even though not all of them may have paid off.

    segaismysavior: I pretty much agree with everything you just said. :p

  4. Centrale says:

    I love both of them, with JSRF possibly my favorite game of all time. For me the main improvement was with the flow of the levels, with many more possibilities to continuously grind through the levels for long periods of time. But I did also like the spraypainting "gestures" from the first one. Hopefully there will be a third game in the series some day which combines the strengths of both.

  5. UrameshiBR says:

    JSR made me addicted to it and its story and characters. Only to have JSRF change everything. It isn't a bad game, but it would be better if JSR didn't come before it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.