SEGAbits Forums

Gaming => General Gaming Discussion => Topic started by: George on June 04, 2010, 08:29:43 pm

Title: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: George on June 04, 2010, 08:29:43 pm
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/109/1094988p1.html (http://ps3.ign.com/articles/109/1094988p1.html)

Who is going to get the game? I am, the review didn't sell me, this video did:
[youtube:1y8kt7fz]GcMnLnrOPs8[/youtube:1y8kt7fz]
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: Autosaver on June 04, 2010, 08:44:58 pm
Hey look, a title Nintendo should of done when it released ExciteBikes for WiiWare. :(

Never heard of the game until now. Bet no one has either.
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: Monkeroony on June 05, 2010, 09:35:02 am
That looks amazing.
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: Aki-at on June 05, 2010, 01:49:09 pm
Saw this a while back, I suppose it could be a fun little game.
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: Sega Uranus on June 05, 2010, 02:09:52 pm
Quote from: "Autosaver"
Hey look, a title Nintendo should of done when it released ExciteBikes for WiiWare. :(

Never heard of the game until now. Bet no one has either.

This could be a genuine Wii release and still do good I think, though the level designer would have killed Wii's flash memory.

And Joe Danger is actually a really popular game online so far, where have you been?!

As for my opinion on the game, I think it looks great. Way better than Trials HD (Fuck you Barry, that game sucks!)  :x
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: Barry the Nomad on June 05, 2010, 04:13:19 pm
This is your final warning* Sega Uranus.

*final warning in the non-moderator sense, a "i'm just joking around" final warning. Next time I'll post a picture of Bentley Jones rather than confuse things.

It's all good  :afroman:
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: Centrale on June 06, 2010, 02:31:05 pm
Yeah, Trials HD lured me in with its demo but then quickly revealed itself to be a psychotic physics puzzler (that's the PPP genre).  I had never played any of the previous Trials games so I had no idea.  

Joe Danger looks more like what I was hoping for.  I've been reading the developer blogs for months. The only thing is I usually only play online on the 360.  Maybe this'll get me into online for the PS3.
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: Sharky on June 06, 2010, 07:05:06 pm
The game looks pretty fun and I really like how clean the graphics look but I don't see myself spending much time on it so probably wont get it.
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: MadeManG74 on June 06, 2010, 07:14:22 pm
Quote from: "Sharky"
The game looks pretty fun and I really like how clean the graphics look but I don't see myself spending much time on it so probably wont get it.

Not the right company is it?

A day in the life if sharky.
sharky's mum: I made you din dins, its your favourite, eel pie.
sharky: The pie looks pretty tasty and I really like how clean the plate looks but I don't see myself spending much time eating it so probably wont accept it.
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: George on June 06, 2010, 11:17:18 pm
You should see Sharky during sex.

Sharky's Girlfriend Eel: Hey Sharky, I just got this sexy outfit for you.
Sharky: The outfit looks pretty sexy and I really like how clean your legs look but I don't see myself spending much time having sex with you so I won't even bother.
Eel: *cries herself to sleep*
Sharky: *Plays Shenmue all over again to find those damn ducks*
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: MadeManG74 on June 06, 2010, 11:30:37 pm
Waiiiit a minute. If she's an eel, why does she have legs?
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: George on June 06, 2010, 11:57:27 pm
That is her name, Sharky is not a shark.
(http://http://imgur.com/QWVUm.jpg)
Title: Re: IGN: Joe Danger Review
Post by: Sharky on June 07, 2010, 04:06:03 pm
Quote from: "MadeManG74"
Quote from: "Sharky"
The game looks pretty fun and I really like how clean the graphics look but I don't see myself spending much time on it so probably wont get it.

Not the right company is it?

Oh in here too? interesting.