« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 90 91 [92] 93 94 ... 124

Author Topic: Sonic the Hedgehog 4: Episode 1  (Read 523845 times)

Offline Orta

  • *
  • Posts: 1309
  • Total Meseta: 5
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1365 on: October 08, 2010, 06:17:18 pm »
Quote from: "max_cady"
IGN just reviewed the game and one of the negative things they noticed was the lack of co-op.

O...K... That sounds resonable, but co-op in a 2D Sonic game doesn't seem practical in the very least.

Another "thought" thrown into the bunch for the sake of arguing New Super Mario Bros is better. Co-op does not belong in a game like this. If you're good, you'll go fast, if you're new to the game not so much. How do you work that out? These people should get some brains.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged

Offline crackdude

  • *
  • Posts: 4256
  • Total Meseta: 64
  • Nintendo Bling
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1366 on: October 08, 2010, 06:45:22 pm »
"Trust me when I say, they are worse, not just different. The angles in which Sonic can do an idle walk really should not be in this game."
Yes, but I was referring more to the general audience. They tend to not pick up on those things as much as we do of course..

I wasn't a fan of the physics in Rush but I didn't mind them either..

Also by Co-op I'm pretty sure they were thinking of how in Sonic 2 and 3 a second player can pick up the controller and play as Tails.
I think that will be in Ep2.. They'll add Tails to the mix.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged
SEG4GES

Offline Barry the Nomad

  • *
  • Posts: 8806
  • Total Meseta: 713
  • Let's Post!
    • SEGAbits
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1367 on: October 08, 2010, 10:43:15 pm »
Differing physics are fine as long as they aren't game breaking. The game plays well from start to finish with the physics causing few to no problems. Now if you play the game with the intention to compare the physics to a Genesis game, you will find differences but that doesn't mean that a difference = a bad game.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged

Offline Shigs

  • *
  • Posts: 834
  • Total Meseta: 5
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1368 on: October 09, 2010, 02:07:27 am »


Looks like you'll have to work harder George. 8-)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged
Grammar Expert Plus

Offline CrazyT

  • *
  • Posts: 2789
  • Total Meseta: 100
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1369 on: October 09, 2010, 02:37:43 am »
After all the disliking from me and a lot of others towards the game, and now seeing all the good reviews. I realised sonic deserves it after so long. I mean how lang has it been since a "sonic" game on the console was generally well preceived? Yeah exactly.

Sonic 4 is getting good reviews and allthough at the beginning I was like, this game doesn't deserve it exactly imo, now I think this can only take the franchise to a much brighter future. If sonic colors nails it to get good reviews too, this will be a great year for sonic.



PS: Still dislike s4e1 however :oops:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged

Offline crackdude

  • *
  • Posts: 4256
  • Total Meseta: 64
  • Nintendo Bling
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1370 on: October 09, 2010, 07:23:23 am »
CrazyTails did an inverted Sonic Cycle lol
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged
SEG4GES

Offline Aki-at

  • *
  • Posts: 3160
  • Total Meseta: 61
  • The Dragon
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1371 on: October 09, 2010, 07:37:52 am »
Sonic Advance 2 also got a lot of positive reviews, heck Sonic Rush was considered a return to the classic roots of the series, point being blue hedgehog + speed + 2D only = most reviewers going crazy over it, it's not like they realized what made Sonic so good in the first place either.

Not that I'm trying to rain on the parade, but getting good reviews for Sonic games should not be so hard, it's just so happens that they've lacked any direction and terrible QA and horrible planning and some truly atrocious game ideas, that even a okay game would be able to get great reviews so long as it stuck to what people believe is Sonic.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged

Offline Barry the Nomad

  • *
  • Posts: 8806
  • Total Meseta: 713
  • Let's Post!
    • SEGAbits
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1372 on: October 09, 2010, 07:38:49 am »
Were all fucked! Kids at TSS have been running SHZ act 1 in 47 seconds! Yikes!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged

Offline George

  • *
  • Posts: 6263
  • Total Meseta: 668
    • http://www.segabits.com/
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1373 on: October 09, 2010, 10:59:21 am »
WE ARE LOSERS: FUCK US.

30 MINUTES OR BUST, BARRY.

How do you expect to get that high paying job at the DVD making house? THIS IS IT!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged

Offline crackdude

  • *
  • Posts: 4256
  • Total Meseta: 64
  • Nintendo Bling
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1374 on: October 09, 2010, 11:48:09 am »
Sonic Advance 2 was very good. Thats why it got great reviews.

And YOU CAN DO IT BARRY I BELIEVE IN YOU
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged
SEG4GES

Offline Orta

  • *
  • Posts: 1309
  • Total Meseta: 5
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1375 on: October 09, 2010, 12:42:42 pm »
Quote from: "crackdude"
Sonic Advance 2 was very good.

In Sonic Advance 2 you had to cross a bottomless pit to beat a level. "Very good" does not apply to Sonic Advance 2.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged

Offline crackdude

  • *
  • Posts: 4256
  • Total Meseta: 64
  • Nintendo Bling
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1376 on: October 09, 2010, 12:57:55 pm »
Man up and jump that shit.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged
SEG4GES

Offline Orta

  • *
  • Posts: 1309
  • Total Meseta: 5
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1377 on: October 09, 2010, 01:06:31 pm »
I stand correct.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged

Offline Aki-at

  • *
  • Posts: 3160
  • Total Meseta: 61
  • The Dragon
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1378 on: October 09, 2010, 01:22:01 pm »
Quote from: "crackdude"
Sonic Advance 2 was very good. Thats why it got great reviews.

Sonic Advance 2 is hold right to win and has some of the worst level designs in the series.

Which is why I say reviewers have very little idea of what a good Sonic game, makes. Don't make me post maps! I'll do it I swear!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged

Offline crackdude

  • *
  • Posts: 4256
  • Total Meseta: 64
  • Nintendo Bling
Re: Sonic the Hedgehog 4
« Reply #1379 on: October 09, 2010, 01:37:31 pm »
I bought that game when it came out. I didn't read any reviews nor opinions. Just got it, played it and loved it.

So I don't get what's wrong with it.. The Canyon level is hard. The techno one is cheap. But those are supposed to be the hardest levels, so I don't know what to complain about..

There is no "good Sonic game" formula. Some you can enjoy, like Advance 2; some you can't, like Advance 3.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Guest »
Logged
SEG4GES
Pages: 1 ... 90 91 [92] 93 94 ... 124
« previous next »