I just woke up so all this probably won't be as cohesive as I hope it to be. This is a reaction to some communities belief that all is rosy in the world of gaming, that all fans are on the same level regardless of age.
bullllllshiiiiiiit. I say age does matter. It seems I keep encountering children, especially on the official Sega forums, who seem to simply echo what they hear through older gamers who actually have experienced the release of classics.
The Saturn was underappreciated! NiGHTS into Dreams is an awesome game! Okay, so games, like films, can transcend time and be loved by all. But when it comes down to arguing the impact of Sonic 1, I simply can't be bothered to think that a 19 year old knows what they're saying when they say "Sonic 1 was a revolutionary game! The music was awesome! I can still remember the first time I played it!". Yes, the first time you played it, and had cognition to understand and remember the game was in 1997. Not 1991.
Thoughts?
My reply to being called an "elitist":
I'm not saying younger gamers are bad, I'm just saying that there is a difference between knowledge and wisdom.
For example, I know that Super Mario Bros. (1986) was a revolutionary game, but I reached that understanding via the thoughts of those who played it at the time, not through my own experience of playing it at the time of release. I was 2 years old in 1986, so I can't claim to have a better understanding of mid-80's platforming games compared to a gamer in their 30's.
It's not elitism, it's a matter of experience versus hearsay.