Super Mario Galaxy is overhyped.
It's good, not THAT good. I don't get how some reviewers complain about certain aspects of the game and then give it a 10/10. It's biased shit.
And people like me don't even like the game. I didn't like Mario 64, why the hell would I like a game that is basically the same?
Also, I've never read anywhere anyone say that Sonic 06 is the worst game of all time. Even because Sonic 06 wasn't all bad. It was just very very very bellow everyone's expectations. Still, most people that actually played it said that it had some fun parts.
But, going back to the thread, it's not a case of having to love it just cause it's Sonic, it's just that there is no need to state that this will be the best or the worst. It can be both. Until it comes out lots of things will change.
As Sonic and mainly Sega fans I think I would enjoy more these topics if we discussed nice possibilities of things that could be in the game. A creative discussion on what would be cool to do in the game. It would certainly be better than saying stuff like:
"This is literally the game that is making me sell my Wii, it has some of the blandest level design I have seen in a Sonic game in a long while"
So you're going to sell your Wii because of a gameplay video you just saw Sanus? I think that is way more over-the-top than calling it GOTY (note I'm not denying that it's more probable) in my opinion. Still everyone is against the guy that is thinking positively of the game. Is this how low we think of Sega games?
That is why I think we (me included sometimes) shouldn't criticize so much. Let's give these new games a chance of being legendary, shall we? If we don't do it, who will? Reviewers? ah!