That isn't the point. >_>
Sonic Colors is opting for a happy and colorful graphic style.
This stage looks like a cross between Chun-nan at night and parts of Eggmanland. The substantial difference is that its graphics aren't quite as high tech as the HD versions of SU.
Obviously, this game is quite colorful and awesome, even considering its hardware. ^__^ But graphical "eye candy" compared to SU on 360...? Maybe that'd be true to people who are near-sighted and sitting far away from their tv sets.
Just imagine how much better this game could look on an HD console...
*Slaps face
Obviously, the 360 version looks better. Because its on advanced hardware. But I'm talking about the style.
I own the 360 version, and the game looks nice. But its VERY realistic. Sonic Colors on the other hand, takes the realistic stages, puts cartoony features in them = Sonic Colors.
Take Super Mario Sunshine and compare it to Galaxy. Similar consoles, but the one with the very cartoony/space/colorful art wins.
I think some of you aren't seeing.
Take the picture of Sonic falling down the silo. It's an aquarium with fish swarming around and a nice blue and green blend.
Now take Sonic Unleashed, Spagonia. And take a picture of a silo.
Its all gray and white and boring. Yes, its in HD and its very detailed textures. But do you see where my point is going? If you still don't understand, I could make a side by side comparison.
Edit: Ugh, just realized that I'm going to the realistic VS Cartoony argument. Which really boils down to opinion. X_X