Never said otherwise , but when a game is 1st shown off in a screen shot or in a small preview vid all one has to go on is how the game looks and sounds . When I was going into the Arcades back in the early 80's what drew me to Space Harrier and the OutRun coin ups was the amazing sound and visuals on display and other hand G-Loc which looked and sounded amazing play like utter rubbish.
We're not in the 1980s anymore, the industry has changed. But you did make the (poor) correlation between graphics and the best games.
Why not, when the Wii U is hardly any more powerful than the 360 or PS3 . Pikmin III looks quite stunning in parts .
Because if we're talking about graphics that wow people on solely that, graphics, then the Wii U is a poor choice to make that argument.
It quite clear what you said ,It's quite obvious you can't find the quote and trying to backtrack . Like I said, I never ever made out that the Hedgehog engine was more impressive than either Capcom's MT Framework or EA/Dice Frostbite engines.
No it's quite clear you have problems either understanding English or poor recollection of the events. It's been established by every major forum member here your defensive attitude towards the engine.
I have no need to quote you on anything as you clearly started this and continue to drag up (Incorrectly remembered.) past events.
What every way you want to class it, its hard to get worked up about a game that looks and plays almost exactly the same on the PS4 as it does on the PS3 and you name me any game that doesn't have 'content' because every single game ever made does , The content that is in Ishi on the PS4 is exactly the same as what's in the PS3 - . Like I say at the mo SEGA Japan don't have any next gen tech to show off at the mo , do they ? .
Again you aren't getting grips with what the word content means which is why you always bring up the next gen tech for some reason. Content means new video games and I'm sure plenty of people would like to play Ishin or Zero on either console, this wasn't a debate about is actually producing the best looking game but if SEGA has enough content produced to support some player's appetite.
And you do ? . The money men will always look at how the last game performed and sold that's what usually either spells a end to a game or when the game is green lite to produce a sequel . Tying Sonic to the Wii U was just a total cock up on SEGA/Sammy port and lets hope that SEGA don't make the same mistake again and make Sonic multi platform again
And have I implied that I know what is going in their heads? No, however I have pointed out numerous times the fallacy of your arguments and the incorrect judgement you make. This splinter of discussion only began because you wanted to drum hard that the series was no longer a multimillion seller then went further off in how you tried to paint knowing the inner workings of SEGA.
However after confirming Sonic is still going to be appearing on consoles, following two disappointments on the Wii U, I think it's fair to say you've been proven wrong again.