I never said that your "view" of the game is correct, or incorrect. You must be confusing me with someone else. But you've been on the defensive and combatative for pages and pages now.
No i'm not confusing you with anyone else.
All that I have been doing is citing the major issues that people have with the game. The game got negative reviews. Negative. Not mixed. Reviews have been negative. "Mixed" is when there is just as much positive as there is negative. Sonic and the Secret Rings got "mixed reviews." Aliens: Colonial Marines has gotten negative reviews from both the press, the fans, and average gamers. People aren't (generally) happy with the final product that they've received. And if there are legions of people liking the game, they certainly aren't speaking up.
No its been mixed overall. You can go and actually read metacritic to see positive reviews from both critics and gamers alike as well as average reviews to the negative ones. So considering you used that site to prove a point to me i dont see how you could have missed that.
Dude if we had to play every single game we discussed on these forums then there would be no discussion here at all because people can't afford to do that. If you're rich then by all means send the rest of us $$ to buy the games if it bothers you so much.
I actually do buy every game where Sega is concerned. If a game is bad i would definatly say it is. if its a bad game but i happen to enjoy it i would say that too. What i wouldn't do is complain about something i haven't tried out yet. In this day and age there meant to be various ways you can try out a game before actually purchasing it. So i really don't understand that particular stance.
I am not writing a review of this game. Obviously if I was I would have played it, as people look to a reviewer to have thoroughly played the game. I am a gamer on a message board discussing a game that has been universally trashed. I am under no obligation to play this game. I'm not even an Aliens fan, honestly. But I believed the hype and was eagerly anticipating the Wii U version of this game...which was delayed, thankfully. I would have bought it on Day 1 if it hadn't been, and you think I'd be singing a different tune if I paid $60 for this? No, if anything I'd be hating this game even more than I already am for what it will do to gamers' trust in Sega. It scares me to think that this is the first "Sega game" in many years for a lot of people who are buying it. Judging from their reactions, they were not impressed.
Were going a bit overboard aren't we? There's been many sega games people have brought in large numbers down the last few years, BAYONETTA and SONIC ASR:T are among them.
But I never once said that you were "wrong" for liking the plot. Or for liking the game. All I've said is that your opinion is in the distinct minority, from what I've seen.
I never said i liked the plot or liked the game. That's the indication that you just haven't registered on what i'm saying because you don't like dissenting opinions.
1 I don't judge a game until i played it. which is what i 've said.
2 I think the reaction to this game not being good is overblown and to a degree orchestrated.Which is what i've said all along
3 There are obvious flaws in the game( a point i never disputed)
4 Looking at various media from the game press to newspaper reviews and on metacritic it isn't as one sided as i would have expected it to be.
But because i said these things all of a sudden i'm accused of liking the game and also defending it. I'm not defending anything in particular but like you who seems to be cynical on sega, i'm weary of the gaming press telling me that a game is bad because its from a particular publisher that they happen to dislike.So instead of believing the hype i like to play it for myself.
And you have yet to provide me any examples of people loving this game, all you've done is tell me that my examples are "not to be taken seriously." Sorry but that's not a very compelling argument. Provide evidence to support your claims or (Like you threatened to do in your previous post.)
You got goolge check yourself. The remark is down to the fact that if one hasn't played the game how can i take your views on it seriously? Reasonably to me.
stop trying to discuss this with me.
Then stop responding.
Are you still hung up on that? Take my advice and let it go............the big font was to emphasize a point; (I don't feel the Bold Text stands out particularly well against our site's background) It was not to "yell." I've already explained this to you once, you refuse to believe me. Why, I'm not sure. But I'm quickly losing interest in trying to find out.
Whatever you say, in the context it seems like you were shouting your point.
