Damn! Unfair. But as I suggested:- The other Sega stores could've at least import merch from America's Sega store.
- They could also be a platform for Sega products not made by them, but still licenced. Such as Retro-Bit's Sega controllers.
- Simply have cooler stuff to sell. Clothing, accessories and figurines are nice, such as the Sega Genesis Mini?[/l][/l][/l][/l][/l][/l]
Importing from US would add the final cost.
May be they could have partners from around the countries the store's in or from within the country itself to cut the costs.
At least they already have three official stores (eventough none of them shipped to our countries), that's a start.
[/q]
Pardon my lack of enthusiasm. Especially if we do get a Sonic Adventure 3, whose to say Sonic Team will keep the formula faithful to how it was for the Dreamcast and not make Sonic Adventure 3 double as Sonic Frontiers 2?
If they had just "made up" Dreamcast Sonic, then they would have a Sonic I can trust to star in Sonic Adventure 3.
I don't know either.
May be it wouldn't have to be Sonic Team who made Sonic Adventure 3.
It could be third parties who cared about "Dreamcast Sonic" but so far I don't see any fan games that could catch their attention.
I thought the Sega Hard Girls were canon?
They are canon but it's in different universe.
Sega Hard Girls in anime, in "Dengeki Bunko Fighting Climax" game, and in crossover game "Superdimension Neptune VS Sega Hard Girls" aren't the same.
They had their own universe.
Does Tennouboshi get along with Dreamcast well?
Yes, they fought at first meeting but then got along later.
Unlike SEGA Hard Girls who only based on SEGA consoles, Neptunia characters are more than SEGA console girls.
For side characters, we got Noire based on PlayStation 3.
Blanc (front in the pic) based on Nintendo Wii.
Vert (back in the pic) based on Xbox 360.
While the main character, Neptune, of course representing Sega Genesis/Mega Drive and Sega 32X combined as ... SEGA Neptune.
Later in the game you'll find many characters based another consoles too (PC-Engine/TurboGrafx-16, Neo Geo, etc) and even based another game companies (Bandai Namco, Capcom, etc).
But the console war between Sega and Nintendo are still the most well known. And with a wide variety of characters from both the Super Smash Bros. serie sand the Sega All-Stars series, there's plenty of characters to market a rivalry with.
Even after Sega lost the console war to Nintendo, "Who will win? Sonic or Mario?" is still just as popular "Superman vs Batman" or "Superman vs Goku" or other popular who will win questions.
And even to this day, there are still some loyalist who side between Sega and Nintendo, despite how vastly different they are now.
I don't trust Nintendo collaborating with Sega to have Sonic games, especially given Nintendo are the sort to push Sega down the stairs and the media will think Sega is just clumsy.
But, if done right, Sega and Nintendo could make a market rivalry if done right.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62xLWZgx4Ko
Sure they are popular but the question is ... for what purpose?
Nintendo doesn't have to do that to make profits.
And if they did that, their other partners (game companies that released games on their Switch) would get jealous and asked for special treatment too like the one they gave to SEGA.
[/list]
