History tends to repeat itself. But this time it's probably with the other religion.
Arthurian-lore, and it's association with British history is much more complicated than it may seem. My second-eldest brother knows more on it than I do.
Don't say it like that, you're younger than me. While I'm ready to pass anytime, I still want to live to see how we advance as a human race.
Super-rich? Batman then.
Or Elon Musk. Or Zuckerberg.
Elon Musk and Zuckerberg are super-rich, but not super heroes. If anything, having websites that data harvest is more of a villain thing, but they're not recognised as villains, just businessmen.
"Super rich" might as well be regarded as a super-power because it's not like Bruce Wayne can fund his vigilante as Batman on a minimum wage budget. All superheroes who "don't have super powers" are usually backed up with a huge, near-infinite fortune.
You don't see Batman picking up his thrown batarangs to save money on them, or using cheap cosplay armour to fight criminals with actual guns.
Some things are best left forgotten.
Including our past life.
I think in my past life I was a snake since I always curious with them but my family always forbid me.
We are meant to forget them. But if resurrection is real, then what's the point of it? Why isn't the soul dissolved and mixed with the aether after death if that's how renewal goes about, why one after another? In some cultures' it is believe we learn spiritual lessons in one life that may improve on our next life.
It's kinda hard. The costumed superhero concept relies on a "suspension of disbelief" from the audience to accept that these characters and their actions are possible within the story's world.
In the real world, it won't work. Governments and polices would hate you since you messed up with their corrupted system.
But in our world, it would be very possible to regard corrupted government and policies as "villains". Granted not costumed villains but still bad guys.
Take Wilson "Kingpin" Fisk for example.
He's regarded as a one of Spider-Man's villains (and sometimes Daredevils), he may look iconic with his large rotund physique and his claim all that mass is muscle. But unlike Green Goblin, Electro, Vulture or the other Sinister Six, he doesn't wear a mask or costume, his "Kingpin" name is from the fact he governs the criminal empire in New York, but still maintains a public image that is favourable to most, with some stories of him running for politics (and winning with unfavourable means). Depending on continuity, most of the public know his Kingpin name and why he is called that, but still has political sway.
Granted, in a real life situation, if a hero took on a corrupted politician, that politician may spin the media to make it seem like the hero is a terrorist. In which case, it's up for the hero to keep on the fight for mere concepts of "good" and "justice", despite the backlash from the very people they're fighting for.
If individuals with combat-efficient superpowers exist and those individuals choose to be superheroes, I doubt it would be all that easy lives. But usually they do it because no one else would, regardless praise or scorns from the public.
It's why I believe even if there is such thing as superpowers, why no one has stepped up to being a superhero, because it doesn't seem worth it.
I can't choose to be a superhero because I am barely a functioning person as it is. But I still feel I am living a blessed life. And if my next life requires a karma-cost of suffering to make up for it, if I have to have a life of suffering, I want it to be worthwhile as a superhero.
