IGN gave it an 8.5, praising the visuals, soundtracks and script Sharky.
They actually also go on to call it the best sonic game since 1992.
But I was talking about Game Trailers who seem to have already written the review before it even came out... The whole thing stinks of 'We already knew what we'd rate it/say about it.'
It almost reads like a 'how to review 3D Sonic games in 2010 handbook' that they simply plucked key phrases and punch lines out of it at random. Something that might have actually been suitable for every 3D Sonic game up until this point.
Like I've always said, I take the average score of all the big critic sites and then find the average. So this isn’t exactly a big deal really. But I think this shows that some critics have no idea what they are talking about when reviewing a Sonic game. Which is a shame because usually I think Game Trailers is pretty spot on.
@Mademan, Please give it a rest already... I liked Sonic 4, so did lots of people and lots of critics. I don't care if it is a joke... It's wearing pretty thin.
I found Mafia 2 was a pretty boring, half baked sandbox game... I didn't enjoy it when my friend and I played it at his place and neither of us could be bothered to finish it... But I didn't take every opportunity to rub it in your face or anything. So don't take every opportunity to rub my opinions in my face. Epically considering you haven't played Sonic 4 yet to my knowledge.
(mostly joking etc, except not.)
